Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8068 13
Original file (NR8068 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 SS. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JSR

Docket No. NR8068-13
19 June 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13191-10

    Original file (13191-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 May 2010 and his rebuttal dated 24 May 2010, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, McBride and Vogt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13

    Original file (NR4525 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7811 14

    Original file (NR7811 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to 4s Petitioner, filed epclosure (1) with this Boaré requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entry dated 26 March 2014 lcopy at Tab A). That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0955 14

    Original file (NR0955 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14

    Original file (NR4610 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2410 14

    Original file (NR2410 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 February 2011 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Iving and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1’ July...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3835 14

    Original file (NR3835 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navat record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry Gated 6 November 2012 (copy at Tab A). he Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7865 14

    Original file (NR7865 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMEW?T OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entries dated 15 October 2013 {copy at Tab A) and 8 April 2014 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk and Messrs. Exnicios and Grover, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8698 14

    Original file (NR8698 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 3 January 2014. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14

    Original file (NR3747 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...